Tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking

That being said, i do not think that tobacco companies should be held responsible for illnesses or death related to their products marketing is just a suggestion the person had to make a conscious decision to go to the store, purchase the product, and use it repeatedly. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for health – related illnesses and deaths after the real facts about smoking came out any deaths and health related illnesses that happened while they were hiding the truth should be used against tobacco companies and they should be held responsible smoking is a choice that people make. The war on tobacco each day, millions of americans of all ages light up a cigarette distributed by the tobacco companies smoking is a habit that, in the long run, causes cancer and other diseases associated with the lungs.

Should tobacco companies be responsible for smoking related illnesses tobacco companies should not be held liable for the consequences of smoking related illness or death because as people we have a choice whether or not to smoke. The tobacco companies should have made the dangers of smoking more clear to smokers neil bastiman, uk when i was a teenager, over 40 years ago now, the pressure to smoke was intense - and not just peer pressure either. Should tobacco companies be held responsible and liable for costs associated with lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses (2005, september 05. I think smoking companies should be responsible for smoking related deaths if something was wrong with the smokes eg food poisoning dangerous chemicals or different ingredien ts then the.

Yes, they should be held responsible points (why yes) 1- health (fatal illness, tobacco companies can be accountable for a great percentage of lung cancer and other diseases caused by tobacco. People hear about tobacco uses and how they affect your body but apparently they don't listen so they can not hold any tobacco company responsible for deaths or and diseases that come with smoking. Once considered invulnerable to lawsuits, tobacco companies are now being attacked under the same laws used by consumers to seek damages from chemical and drug companies and other manufacturers. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths what would a socially responsible tobacco company look like it could certainly not be defined as such if it did not address the harm its products cause.

The effects of tobacco #2 tobacco causes diseases such as lung cancer, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd), chronic bronchitis and emphysema and over 85 million americans are currently living with these diseases. Tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking (1781 words, 3 pages) the war on tobacco each day, millions of americans of all ages light up a cigarette distributed by the tobacco companies. Tobacco companies make it known that their product causes smoke related illnesses and death therefore they should not be held responsible -actually, they try their hardest to get around that law they make the labels as small as possible so it can't be easily seen.

In a 1989 gallup poll, only 16% of americans said tobacco companies should be held responsible for smokers' health problems, while 79% said they should not more than a decade later, gallup found relatively little change in this sentiment. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deathswrite an argumentative thesis, and support the thesis in a four- to six-paragraph argumentative essay. Sure tobacco companies make it even more addictive by adding ammonia and other chemicals to cigarettes, but younger smokers knew the risks when they started there's even a warning on the cigarette packet. I dont think so- yes some illnes and death is terrible but its an option to chew or smoke tobacco holding them responsible is like crying when the fire burns you-- it was your choice to play with the fire. The only reason tobacco companies should and are being held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths is because the tobacco company executives lied to congress when they all stated before a congressional hearing that tobacco smoking was not addictive.

Tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking

The centers for disease control and prevention says cigarette smoking is responsible for 151,322 cancer deaths annually in the united states most of those -- 116,920 -- are from lung cancer the cdc says men who smoke are 22 times more likely to die from lung cancer than non-smokers. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for tobacco related illnesses or deaths answer questions colonoscopy showed clear but i have constant stomach pains and urges to go to the bathroom. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths nobody downloaded yet should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths - research paper example comments (0) add to wishlist delete from wishlist.

Tobacco companies, not the smoker, should be held responsible if smoking results in disease and deathnicotine is a highly addictive substance, and quitting it is a struggle for most smokers the government should take action to stop people smoking and should also take action against the tobacco companies. The tobacco industry has contributed to the tobacco epidemic, and it should be held responsible for its portion of the clean-up costs health care cost recovery lawsuits obtain the truth health care cost recovery litigation will obtain the truth through public disclosure of internal tobacco industry documents. Should businesses that sell products which are responsible for a huge numbers of deaths, illness and injury, such as tobacco and junk food, be held accountable and made to improve public health.

Tobacco companies should be held accountable for the deaths and illnesses caused by the use of their products smoking account for an estimated 443,000 deaths, or nearly one of every five deaths, each year in the united states, and nearly 5 million deaths worldwide. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related deaths all papers must be typed, double spaced, left aligned, using a 12pt times new roman font. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related diseases - july 17th, 2013 it is also important to note that tobacco is not only risky to the smoker it is also damaging to anyone in the region within the parameter in which an individual inhales the smoke which is also recognized as second hand smokers.

tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking In the end the companies should not be held responsible and it is the consumers choice to use the product the companies are selling to the public. tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking In the end the companies should not be held responsible and it is the consumers choice to use the product the companies are selling to the public.
Tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking
Rated 4/5 based on 38 review

2018.